565 Broome Street

565 Broome Soho is a high-friction luxury asset that struggles with post-sponsor liquidity. While the building commands premium pricing ($2,500+ PPSF) and offers high nominal rents, it fails to efficiently capture that value due to chronic transaction delays—with resale units often sitting for 300+ days and rentals vacant for 200+ days. Appreciation is highly stratified: 2020 buyers secured nearly 20% gains, while 2019 buyers are facing flat or negative returns. This is not a yield play or a liquid safe haven; it is a long-term lifestyle purchase where the exit strategy requires patience and significant lead time.
Tony InJe Yeo's avatar
Feb 27, 2026
565 Broome Street

1. BUILDING OVERVIEW (ANALYST FRAMING)

  • Building Type: Luxury Condo (New Development, Built 2018)

  • Location: Hudson Square / Downtown (565 Broome Street)

  • Scale: 25 Floors, 115 Units

  • Classification: Appreciation-Driven (High Friction)

    • Justification: Post-sponsor behavior shows extreme volatility in liquidity and mixed appreciation results. While price points are high ($2,000–$3,000+ PPSF), the building suffers from chronic liquidity drag (high DOM) in both sales and rentals, preventing it from functioning as a true "Defensive" asset.

Sponsor Normalization Disclosure: Transactions from 2019–2020 with DOM < 30 days (e.g., Units S7A, S20A, S24A) were flagged as Sponsor-driven and excluded from resale liquidity metrics to prevent artificial velocity signals.

  • Impact: Normalized resale median DOM is significantly higher than the building-wide historical average of 168 days.


2. UNIT MIX & COMPOSITION

Based on transaction-weighted data, the building leans heavily toward larger family-sized units:

  • Studio / 1 Bed: ~19% of activity (High turnover, lower impact)

  • 2 Beds: ~30% of activity (Core inventory)

  • 3 Beds: ~28% of activity (Dominant value driver)

  • 4 Beds+: ~6% of activity (Trophy assets)

Analysis: The concentration of large units (2-3 beds) exposes the building to higher volatility; these units currently show the highest DOM friction (e.g., 3 Beds median DOM: 467 days).


3. LINE (STACK) PERFORMANCE — RESALE ONLY

A. Liquidity (Resale Speed) Liquidity is critically low for a building of this caliber.

  • Fastest: Smaller units (Studio/1 Bed) occasionally clear in <100 days.

  • Slowest: Large units (3 Beds) are averaging over a year to sell.

  • Example: Unit N9E (3 Bed) took 2,357 days on market (likely lingering since construction or re-listed repeatedly) before closing in Oct 2025. Unit N20B took 336 days.

B. Appreciation (Compound Growth) Performance is highly sensitive to Market Regime Timing (Entry Date).

  • 2019/Pre-Covid Buyers: generally seeing flat or negative returns.

  • 2020/Covid Dip Buyers: seeing healthy appreciation (~18%).

  • Dispersion: Significant variance between North (N) and South (S) towers.


4. BUILDING-WIDE PPSF TREND (NORMALIZED)

  • Trend: Cyclical / Mean-Reverting

  • Resale Pricing: Generally trading between $2,100 and $3,300 PPSF.

  • Drawdown: Recent 3-Bed and 4-Bed sales show discounts from original ask ranging from -5.66% to -18.8%. The building is not currently compounding value linearly; it is struggling to hold peak pricing.


5. RENT CAPTURE ANALYSIS

A. Rent Capture Metrics While nominal rents are high ($15k–$35k/mo), the Time to Rent (Rental DOM) destroys the effective yield.

  • Unit S12A (2 Bed):

    • Nominal Rent: $15,500

    • DOM: 218 Days

    • Effective Rent Calculation: $15,500 \times ((365 - 218) / 365) = $6,241

    • Result: 60% of Year 1 income leaked to vacancy.

  • Unit S12C (2 Bed):

    • Nominal Rent: $19,950

    • DOM: 210 Days

    • Result: Massive income leakage.

B. Rent Appreciation Nominal rents have softened.

  • Unit S12C rented for $19,950 in Dec 2024 (210 DOM).

  • Same line S12C previously rented for $18,500 in Jun 2023 (46 DOM).

  • Analysis: While asking rent increased, the explosion in DOM (46 $\to$ 210 days) indicates market resistance to price hikes.


6. B³ SCORING SYSTEM (0–100)

Category

Score (0-100)

Rationale

Liquidity

35

Critical Weakness. Resale DOMs often exceed 1 year (e.g., 318, 336, 843 days). Inventory clears very inefficiently.

Rent Capture

50

High Leakage. Strong face rents are negated by extreme vacancy periods (100–200+ days).

Appreciation

60

Volatile. 2020 buyers profited, but 2019 buyers are breaking even or losing capital.

COMPOSITE

48

Classification: High-Friction Luxury


7. TRANSACTION EXAMPLES

Appreciation Examples (Growth)

  1. N24A (3 Bed): Bought Dec 2020 ($6.995M) $\to$ Sold Feb 2024 ($8.25M). +17.9%.

    • Driver: Market Regime Timing (Bought at Covid lows, sold into strength).

  2. S25A (3 Bed): Bought Jun 2019 ($6.75M) $\to$ Sold Aug 2022 ($7.5M). +11.1%.

    • Driver: Line-level premium persistence (High floor cleared market despite headwinds).

  3. N10C (2 Bed): Bought Apr 2019 ($3.79M) $\to$ Sold Aug 2025 ($4.2M). +10.8%.

    • Driver: Market Regime Timing (Long hold period of 6 years allowed slow compounding).

  4. S10A (1 Bed): Bought Dec 2022 ($2.43M) $\to$ Sold Jan 2025 ($2.57M). +5.7%.

    • Driver: Market Regime Timing (Short hold, minor gain).

Depreciation / Stagnation Examples (Loss/Flat)

  1. S26A (3 Bed): Bought Jul 2019 ($7.71M) $\to$ Sold Sep 2025 ($7.5M). -2.8% (Loss).

    • Driver: Market Regime Timing (2019 Peak entry) & Liquidity Shift.

  2. S11E (3 Bed): Bought May 2023 ($4.995M) $\to$ Sold Jun 2025 ($4.995M). 0% (Flat).

    • Driver: Liquidity Shift (Unable to capture value add in 2 years).

  3. S11C (2 Bed): Bought May 2019 ($4.025M) $\to$ Sold Nov 2024 ($358k? - Likely Data Error or Partial Interest). Looking at prior sale: Sold Jun 2022 ($4.16M). +3.3% in 3 years.

    • Driver: Market Regime Timing (Lagged inflation significantly).

  4. N19A (2 Bed): Bought Jul 2019 ($4.83M) $\to$ Sold Feb 2022 ($5.1M). +5.5%.

Driver:Market Regime Timing (Sub-inflation growth over 3 years).


8. RISKS & RED FLAGS

  • Chronic Liquidity Trap: The "Days on Market" for this building is structurally high. Be prepared to hold an asset for 6–12 months when trying to exit.

  • Rental Void Risk: Investors relying on cash flow must underwrite 15–20% vacancy, not the standard 3–5%, due to slow rental absorption (200+ day rental DOMs).

  • Benchmark Lag: The NYXRCSA index is at ~330 (Nov 2025). 565 Broome pricing for 2019 buyers (Index ~270s) has barely moved in nominal terms for many lines (e.g., S26A), meaning real value has eroded significantly compared to the broader market.


10. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

565 Broome Soho is a high-friction luxury asset that struggles with post-sponsor liquidity. While the building commands premium pricing ($2,500+ PPSF) and offers high nominal rents, it fails to efficiently capture that value due to chronic transaction delays—with resale units often sitting for 300+ days and rentals vacant for 200+ days. Appreciation is highly stratified: 2020 buyers secured nearly 20% gains, while 2019 buyers are facing flat or negative returns. This is not a yield play or a liquid safe haven; it is a long-term lifestyle purchase where the exit strategy requires patience and significant lead time.


B³ SCORECARD

Category

Score (0-100)

Liquidity

35

Rent Capture

92

Appreciation

55

COMPOSITE

60

Disclosures:

  • Adjustment: A significant cluster of over 30 sales recorded between April 2019 and December 2020 (e.g., Units N10C, N7A, S26A, and PHNORTH) are designated with "No Listing" status or zero DOM [11–20].

  • Impact: Per B³ Protocol, these transactions are classified as Sponsor-Driven (initial sell-out) and are strictly excluded from current resale liquidity calculations. They establish the launch cost basis, which ranges widely from ~2,100–2,500 PPSF for standard units to $5,425 PPSF for penthouses [14–20].

Share article

Welcome to YRE